| ||||
|
[ Post New Message | Reply | Edit Profile | Register | Search | Current Connections | Message Board FAQ | Lost Password? ]
14.2 @ 99 Posted By: 1994formula89 On: 10-13-2008 @ 12:32:01 Reply | Edit just wondering if 14.2 at 99 is average for a lt1 ? Posted By: vesuvius66 On: 10-13-2008 @ 13:45:04 Reply | Top | Edit You're in the right place. Is it an auto or a manual? -- 97 T/A Moroso Cold air intake, Mufflers? We don't need no stinkin mufflers! 91 Camaro RS 5.0L Cat Back, K&N (in process of trying to buy back) Posted By: zstr28 On: 10-13-2008 @ 13:49:19 Reply | Top | Edit I went to the track Saturday and ran my stock 97 A-4 3.23's and with .280 reaction time did a 14.39 @96 mph. Sounds right on par to me.  -- 95 Z28, A-4, K&N intake, TF elbow, polished 52mm Edelbrock,free mods, gutted cat, Magnaflow catback, LT4 roller timing set, A/C AIR & EGR del. Meziere EWP, Hypertech prog, 160 stat, Hyp Tech coil, New GM transmission, rebuilt posi 2:73's. 97 Z28 convertable, A-4, fully loaded,bone stock.  
Posted By: zstr28 On: 10-13-2008 @ 17:43:44 Reply | Top | Edit I see your from WI... did you run at Rockfalls? -- 95 Z28, A-4, K&N intake, TF elbow, polished 52mm Edelbrock,free mods, gutted cat, Magnaflow catback, LT4 roller timing set, A/C AIR & EGR del. Meziere EWP, Hypertech prog, 160 stat, Hyp Tech coil, New GM transmission, rebuilt posi 2:73's. 97 Z28 convertable, A-4, fully loaded,bone stock.
Posted By: 1994formula89 On: 10-13-2008 @ 23:13:19 Reply | Top | Edit i ran in earlville Iowa on sunday and its a manual... i figure a could get 13.9 if i had a better reaction time Posted By: RoAdRaGe912 On: 10-13-2008 @ 23:52:11 Reply | Top | Edit 14.2 is fine for stock. Lots of people never do that well, especially manual. My fastest time in a bone stock 94 auto was 14.007, but this was at one of the best tracks in the nation. I've seen below -2000 DA on one night. Reaction time has nothing to do with your actual ET. --  Posted By: Calaban007 On: 10-14-2008 @ 15:47:22 Reply | Top | Edit My best run in my Z28 was: Reaction: .157 I1: 2.506 I2: 6.494 I3: 9.722 MPH: 76.418 ET: 14.835 MPH: 96.396 M.O.V 1.525 (whatever that is.) That's with a CAI and Flowmaster. -- 
1995 Camaro Z28, M6, T-Top Conversion & 1989 IROC-Z Stock restoration in progress, well almost stock 
http://www.myspace.com/163296073 Posted By: ScreaminEagle91 On: 10-15-2008 @ 20:41:46 Reply | Top | Edit Calaban, you could drop your times in the 1/4 dramatically with a better 60 ft time. I ran a 2.0 60' in my best time listed in my sig. IMO, one of the best ways to run a good quarter is to start with a good, kinda long, smoky burnout. It gets the tires hot n sticky, and gets your adrenaline pumpin. In my A4, i staged it hard, and hit the light perfect. As soon as i had traction, the pedal went to the floor, and i shifted it manually. I recently installed Magnaflow catback and a cutout, pics coming soon, and im hopin to drop another 1 or 2 tenths next trip to the track. good luck and keep us posted with your times --  1995 Camaro Z-28... air-foil, CAI, TB Bypass, ORY, cut-out, Magnaflow catback, more to come! 13.971 @ 99 mph [ Edited on 10/15/2008 @ 20:50:34 ] Posted By: RoAdRaGe912 On: 10-15-2008 @ 21:36:57 Reply | Top | Edit There's no point in trying to manually shift a non-manual valve body transmission. The setpoints aren't that much lower than the rev limiter and being as you're mostly stock there would be no advantage to shifting higher if you moved the stock rev limiter. There is definitely an easy half to almost full second to be gained in the 1/4 from improving that 60'. I was snapping off high 1.9XX 60' with 245 wide street tires in the old car when it was auto and no cam. -- Posted By: 1994formula89 On: 10-15-2008 @ 23:17:36 Reply | Top | Edit thanks for the replies... how do u get a pic of your car on here Posted By: Calaban007 On: 10-16-2008 @ 06:26:08 Reply | Top | Edit My tires were/are hard as a brick and I tried it two ways. Once, I did a burnout and then I took off like I was at a stop sign. The stop sign technique gave me the best numbers. But, I know there's more there. Installing the the SFC's I have, getting LCA's and Brackets, and some decent tires would help out a bunch. Then taking out my 100 lbs of stereo equipment. I maybe could have gotten it lower that night but I only ran about 5 times. I need a new clutch before I can go back. Hopefully I can get back out next year, depending on when they close the local track. --
1995 Camaro Z28, M6, T-Top Conversion & 1989 IROC-Z Stock restoration in progress, well almost stock
http://www.myspace.com/163296073 Posted By: 49z On: 12-05-2008 @ 14:57:39 Reply | Top | Edit Calaban, M.O.V. stands for margin of victory. It's an important number for bracket racers. -- Factory stock 94 Z-28, auto, t-tops, 2.73 gears. Posted By: dragonz28 On: 12-06-2008 @ 09:43:26 Reply | Top | Edit Mine ran 14.4 @ 99 2.2 60' bone stock. Then I managed a 14.0 by getting a 1.9 60 on same tires. -- 94Z 12.993@102.11 1.72 60  Posted By: Rynb15 On: 12-07-2008 @ 13:37:08 Reply | Top | Edit Stock mine went 14.1 at 99 with a 2.1 60'. then got some better tires and full exhaust and went 13.7 at 101 with a 2.0 60'. -- Sold 
95 Black Z28,M6,Hooker shorty headers, Hooker 3inch catback, flowtech cutout, Spec stage 3 clutch,K&N Cai,Granatelli Maf,1LE Inatke Elbow, airfoil, 160 degree thermostat,LT4 KM, MSD wires,NGK TR6 plugs,short throw shifter,NX wet kit 100 shot, MSD window switch, N.O.S. purge  Posted By: 1994formula89 On: 12-08-2008 @ 21:19:22 Reply | Top | Edit dragonz28 my car is the same color and dame rims but a firebird.....how do u get pics on here ? Posted By: dragonz28 On: 12-08-2008 @ 22:08:54 Reply | Top | Edit I used Photobucket to host my pics then used this guide http://www.fbody.com/forumfaq.htm but it doesn't seem to be working right now. U probably would get better explanations if you asked this question on Anything Goes. I don't have the Z06s anymore. I wanted to keep them but had to sell them to get the Welds. -- 94Z 12.993@102.11 1.72 60' Vig3200, 3.73s, PS Longtubes TDs, H-pipe, bullets dumped and a Madztune.  [ Edited on 12/08/2008 @ 22:23:34 ]
|
||||
| If it looks (c) it probably is - All work done by James Hogan | ||||
