| ||||
|
[ Post New Message | Reply | Edit Profile | Register | Search | Current Connections | Message Board FAQ | Lost Password? ]
03 Mach 1 Posted By: trans95am On: 03-17-2010 @ 17:31:47 Reply | Edit A buddy of mine jus picked up a 2003 Mach 1...bone stock and its a 5 speed...assuming he can drive how do you guys think i would do? mods are in the sig -- 
1995 Trans AM A4: SLP Loudmouth II,Pacesetter Coated Long Tubes, Pacesetter Offroad Y Pipe, NGK TR55 Plugs, Taylor Spiro Pro Wires, SLP CAI, Vortech Elbow, Airfoil, 160 thermo, 17X9.5 Chrome Z06's wrapped in Nitto Street Tires Best ET 13.820 at 99 mph Best 60' ft 2.036 before the Headers/y pipe and plugs/wires Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 01-14-2006 @ 17:53:29 Reply | Top | Edit I'm going to say that from a stop you'll definitally win and that from a roll it will be pretty close. Those cars are definitally very nice and pretty fast, but I think you're bolt-ons wil even it up and the drag radials will give you the win. Let us know. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60'  Posted By: trans95am On: 01-14-2006 @ 18:02:50 Reply | Top | Edit Yeah i have drag radials for when i go to the track. I'll try him on the street and then see if he wants to go at the track --
1995 Trans AM A4: SLP Loudmouth II,Pacesetter Coated Long Tubes, Pacesetter Offroad Y Pipe, NGK TR55 Plugs, Taylor Spiro Pro Wires, SLP CAI, Vortech Elbow, Airfoil, 160 thermo, 17X9.5 Chrome Z06's wrapped in Nitto Street Tires Best ET 13.820 at 99 mph Best 60' ft 2.036 before the Headers/y pipe and plugs/wires Posted By: falbtron On: 01-14-2006 @ 18:55:41 Reply | Top | Edit dude my friends dad is an oral surgeon and he has a 2004 bone stock mach1 5 speed they suck -- 69 Camaro RS/SS 396 (cam, intake, headers) 4-speed. <--Sold Keyword: TORQUE. 69 AMC Javelin SST B.B.O. <--Sold Keyword(s): 2nd car, and im only 16... Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 01-14-2006 @ 22:24:47 Reply | Top | Edit They aren't that slow. I've seen mid 13's out of stock ones and have heard of low 13's. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: hurley_21_07 On: 01-14-2006 @ 22:27:36 Reply | Top | Edit Yeah they are JUST slower than an LS1. Doesn't have as good of top end though. Dan -- || 30th Anniversary Camaro 3800II A4 ||  Silver Sixxers! || See My Baby
MODS: SLP CAI,// DIS-4// 180 Thermo Winter Mods: None after having to pay for lots of gas for the Jeep and same insurance payment. 
 Posted By: trans95am On: 01-14-2006 @ 22:48:41 Reply | Top | Edit yeah hopefully with my mods ill be able to take him --
1995 Trans AM A4: SLP Loudmouth II,Pacesetter Coated Long Tubes, Pacesetter Offroad Y Pipe, NGK TR55 Plugs, Taylor Spiro Pro Wires, SLP CAI, Vortech Elbow, Airfoil, 160 thermo, 17X9.5 Chrome Z06's wrapped in Nitto Street Tires Best ET 13.820 at 99 mph Best 60' ft 2.036 before the Headers/y pipe and plugs/wires Posted By: falbtron On: 01-15-2006 @ 14:10:12 Reply | Top | Edit No they are really heavy and the tranny is the reason why they have trouble at the track. The transmission is placed in the car at an angle an the shifter is like plastic. they are not meant fo rthe track. however they do dyno 305 stock. -- 69 Camaro RS/SS 396 (cam, intake, headers) 4-speed. <--Sold Keyword: TORQUE. 69 AMC Javelin SST B.B.O. <--Sold Keyword(s): 2nd car, and im only 16... Posted By: 30th6 On: 01-15-2006 @ 14:47:01 Reply | Top | Edit ive seen a bone stock one at the track (1/8th)and the best he could get was a 9.4.igot a 9.2 out of mine when it was stock and i couldnt drive it so i think you will have no problem. -- broke it but fixed now 97z28 30th aniv. white&orange m6 75k 60ft 1.881, 330ft 5.244, 594ft 7.530, 1/8th 8.042@87.90 MPH on street tires with these mods-SLP cai,p&p maf,125 wet shot,Hooker LT's, Magnaflow muffler,160 thermostat,homemade fan switches,ls1 DS,b&m shifter,& 4.10's. Posted By: hurley_21_07 On: 01-15-2006 @ 19:00:18 Reply | Top | Edit A Mach will usually run much better than a 14.5(or so). Dan -- || 30th Anniversary Camaro 3800II A4 || Silver Sixxers! || See My Baby
MODS: SLP CAI,// DIS-4// 180 Thermo Winter Mods: None after having to pay for lots of gas for the Jeep and same insurance payment.
Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 01-15-2006 @ 21:02:45 Reply | Top | Edit Yeah, any decent driver will be in the 13's with a good driver getting mid 13's out of one. Also, they are rated 305 flywheel. They make about 270 or so on a dynojet. Also, I doubt they weigh much more than a decently optioned f-body. Maybe 100-150lbs more. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: 25thmustang On: 01-16-2006 @ 22:42:27 Reply | Top | Edit Sometimes I wonder if people research or have ANY experience with these cars, or just talk about them because they dont like them... I for one have driven, looked at, and done everything with Mach 1s short of owning one (I would LOVE to own one, but couldnt afford it). Best stock pass I have seen, is my friends Grey 04 (actually for sale now). Car ran 13.1 and a ton of 13.2-13.4s letting off (bracket racing)... Most of them I see have been between 13.2 and 13.6, and have never actually seen a stocker run slower than 14.0 (yes even seen an auto or two go high 13s). Now thats not to say there arent slow ones out there, drivers can make or break a car, but an average driver should go mid 13s, and a good one low 13s! The transmission is placed in the car exactly like every other 4.6 motor and tranny... not sure where you hear that. And the shifter is just like any other Mustang shifter (most people throw aftermarket ones on anyway). As far as not meant for the track, the fact they are one of the fastest NA Mustangs (if not the fastest) when looking at 1/4 times, Im not sure where you got that MISinformation from! -- 
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: Airbornec507 On: 01-17-2006 @ 20:01:08 Reply | Top | Edit As I was reading this post I kinda wondered too where you guyz are getting your stats from. I run 1/8th mi track and I've never seen a Mach1 run slower than 8.8 and that's high to mid 13s on street tires and the guy just bought the car so driving couldn't have been the strongest for him. Trust me the Mach1 will be a challenge for ya. He will trap slightly higher than you so the shorter the race the better. Since you have DR and I'm assuming he doesn't that's where you will beat him if you get the jump. Don't expect to real him in. That's just from my 1st hand experiance with the Mach1 back when my car had all the bolt ons known to man(stock motor) and I was running 1.806 60' times. -- Brothers 94 Camaro  
95 383 Z28 w/CC306, P&P Heads(272cfm), 3k Stall, !Blown Raptor 4L60E!, 3.73 1.681 60' Don't know what I would have run cuzz tranny 2nd gear went out! R.I.P. Posted By: falbtron On: 01-17-2006 @ 20:23:27 Reply | Top | Edit I've driven it numerous times, which includes takin it hard off the line, from about 40 mph, and even tkaen it through some pretty hard turns at a decent speed. I cant remember where I heard that the shifter was placed at an angle, I just beleived it cause the shift layout is so crooked and misplaced that it actually looks like its put in wrong. I think it might be the way the shifter is made (how it like zig-zags or whatever). His shifter is stock too (aluminum shift knob). No joke, they have lots of power. I was very surprised and I beleive that if he can drive and has any work done at all, it might be trouble. RSM - I'm pretty sure they are rated at 320 hp stock, and dyno 305. Ill check. I went to look and I just found this:http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=565495 It shows a 05 GT that dynos 10 more than a Mach 1. Go tear his a$$ up. -- 69 Camaro RS/SS 396 (cam, intake, headers) 4-speed. <--Sold Keyword: TORQUE. 69 AMC Javelin SST B.B.O. <--Sold Keyword(s): 2nd car, and im only 16... Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 01-17-2006 @ 22:10:58 Reply | Top | Edit I was waiting for you to post, 25th. Nice to hear from you. falbtron, they are rated 310. Now that you found the dyno graph, you see that they don't make 305 to the wheels 
Don't underestimate them...especially if you run from a roll. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: 25thmustang On: 01-17-2006 @ 22:22:06 Reply | Top | Edit They dont make 305 to the wheels, more like 270-290, and the shifter probably feels like that because your not used to Mustangs. I have driven a good amount of them, and they feel just the same as any other Mustang. I can say compared to the Fbodies I have driven I prefer the Mustangs feel (but then again I have driven and been used to a LOT more Mustangs). Its all personal preferance when it comes to that. I am just talking about the facts here, and the facts are they are 13 second cars without any real effort (I wont go into handeling, Im NOT a corner carver) and are just as much set up for the track as any other newer car! Hey RSM, been a while now that our cars are down for the winter. Ill be back out next year, but Im willing to bet you wont recognize me at first...  --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 01-17-2006 @ 23:50:22 Reply | Top | Edit LOL, well since I'm not gay, I'm assuming that you're getting the car painted, lol. I should be putting a cam in my car before the season starts so I'm hoping for some much better times this year. I really want to get out to the track alot this year. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: 25thmustang On: 01-18-2006 @ 00:02:05 Reply | Top | Edit Nice, now that my brother is going to have a car... Me and the family should be at the track a good bit. Im hoping to get some 12.4s (4.10s, and a slight more power) and just have the car look better (actually might be in a magazine shootout)! Ill definately see you out there this year!!! --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 01-18-2006 @ 08:01:33 Reply | Top | Edit That would be awesome to be in a magazine shootout! What mag and what will the guidelines be? -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: TJNAPSTER On: 01-18-2006 @ 13:19:08 Reply | Top | Edit '03 Mach 1, 5-spd, perfect launch will be good for 13.7ish, stock. It will be a good race considering your mod's. -- '99 Trans Am A4, 3.23's,WS6(Ghost-bird)hood,Lid,Flowmaster.0-60(5.2); 13.31@110 '00 Bonneville SLE (daily driver), K&N, Hyperwhite-Blue Xenon Bulbs. '93 Bonneville SSEi, (beater), 10psi-SC, K&N, Hyperwhite-Blue Xenon Bulbs. R.I.P.- 89 Formula TBI, 91 Formula TPI & 95 Formula vert. Posted By: 25thmustang On: 01-18-2006 @ 13:49:10 Reply | Top | Edit Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords, a guy I have been talking to has been back and forth with them about a stock head shootout. Other than having to have the stock E7 heads, the rules are open to whatever. Its not so much a shootout to get a winner, more like a bunch of fast cars come, race, and they post them in the mag in order of fastest to slowest. The track is closed for the day, only you and a couple spectators get to go. They take a bunch of photos, interview you and such, and then you get to race. The only downside is you cant talk about the event until the magazine is published and you cant share any photos you take while there! But you cant beat a closed track, photoshoot for a mag, and a great time!!! And with a perfect launch if your only going 13.7 in a Mach 1, its time to hand the keys over to a decent or good driver, and see the times drop drastically! --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: Airbornec507 On: 01-18-2006 @ 16:17:01 Reply | Top | Edit 13.7 is a time you should see from someone who just bought the car and doesn't completely botch the launch but keeps it under 2.2 60' on street tires. Posted By: TJNAPSTER On: 01-18-2006 @ 17:51:26 Reply | Top | Edit Yeah, I know the magazine times are faster, but my friend's '04 Mach ran 13.4 on slicks, that's why I guestimated 13.7 on radials. -- '99 Trans Am A4, 3.23's,WS6(Ghost-bird)hood,Lid,Flowmaster.0-60(5.2); 13.31@110 '00 Bonneville SLE (daily driver), K&N, Hyperwhite-Blue Xenon Bulbs. '93 Bonneville SSEi, (beater), 10psi-SC, K&N, Hyperwhite-Blue Xenon Bulbs. R.I.P.- 89 Formula TBI, 91 Formula TPI & 95 Formula vert. Posted By: Airbornec507 On: 01-18-2006 @ 18:01:16 Reply | Top | Edit Not a bad guess by any means. Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 01-18-2006 @ 19:32:40 Reply | Top | Edit That sounds awesome 25th! Funny thing is I just picked up my first issue of MM&FF and I'm thinking about getting a subscription (don't worry guys, I'm not getting a stang )-- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: 25thmustang On: 01-18-2006 @ 23:16:32 Reply | Top | Edit Its a decent GUESS... but take my word for it. Thats a slow time for them. Like said before the majority I have seen (I have seen my fair share, at the Ford events I run at) run from 13.2-13.6, and the slower runs I have seen were at a so so track, not a good one! None of these guys were badass drivers either (the guy who ran 13.1 is), but werent bad drivers! Makes me wish I had one! --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 01-19-2006 @ 07:42:45 Reply | Top | Edit If I was going to look into getting a mustang I'd definitally be looking at the Mach 1's. They are definitally badass looking and they don't have the gay 2-valve motor. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: 25thmustang On: 01-19-2006 @ 18:16:30 Reply | Top | Edit Yeah the one Mustang I really, really want. Either that or a 96-01 Cobra! --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 01-19-2006 @ 19:50:30 Reply | Top | Edit Yeah, those 96-98 Cobras are very nice looking. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: 25thmustang On: 01-20-2006 @ 21:15:45 Reply | Top | Edit They have some decent potential as well. The heads are actually well suited for power adders, but NA they can be made to move with the right parts! Even though they cost a good bit more to mod, Id love to try my hand! --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: BlkStanger96 On: 01-21-2006 @ 13:50:57 Reply | Top | Edit Mach 1's are usually good for low 13second runs and the autos are good for 13.6, ive seen a 04 Mach 1 with just a cat-back and some Drag Radials run a 12.8 so they can be pretty quick. -- 1996 Mustang GT ~3:73s ~ BBK CAI ~ Steeda UDPs Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 01-21-2006 @ 18:33:44 Reply | Top | Edit Yeah, I raced one with full exhaust, CAI, and drga radials and he ran a 12.7 @ 107 mph. Not bad at all. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: 25thmustang On: 01-22-2006 @ 20:32:32 Reply | Top | Edit We had an orange one run with us up in NH the past two years. Car had a few suspension mods, full exhaust, all the bolt ons, but a stock motor (TB to oil pan). Car was going low, low 12s all day (12.0-12.2s) on ET Streets, and weighed in at a solid 3400 lbs (I know, I was the guy who had to check weights because my car wasnt at the track, and I know what all the cars have to weigh)! --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 01-23-2006 @ 07:16:40 Reply | Top | Edit What's the race weight on your car? -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: 25thmustang On: 01-23-2006 @ 14:34:02 Reply | Top | Edit 3200... I can run 3150, but find no point in taking stuff out to lose 50 lbs! --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: BlkStanger96 On: 01-26-2006 @ 20:27:53 Reply | Top | Edit I was wrong it ran 12.5 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3854149686762475452&q=mustang -- 1996 Mustang GT ~3:73s ~ BBK CAI ~ Steeda UDPs Posted By: 25thmustang On: 01-26-2006 @ 20:31:31 Reply | Top | Edit Not bad for a midpipe, drag radials and a K&N... Especially the mph! --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: twofast95ta On: 01-29-2006 @ 03:15:27 Reply | Top | Edit I have a 2004 Mach 1 and it is a lot quicker top end than my '95 TA. Stock it ran a 13.5 at 106. It would not hook up, with a 2.2 60' and i could not get a better take off. The car pulls hard top end. As far as power, with a c&l cai, ud pillies, and a handheld tuner i put down 284 hp and 287 ftlbs on a dynopack which is about 5% lower than a dyno jet. the car is in the shop right now for a 4.10 gear and a custom tune, i have hooker headers& o/r x pipe with single chamber flows, ud pullies, cai, and used to have a tuner. The car was very quick, and i know you guys may not belive me but i have put down a few ls1 cars that have mods. I have also lost some. But i dont have any track times after the mods. As far as the shifter i raplaced that pos stock one for a steeda tri-ax. -- '95 Trans Am auto with flowmasters and a 160 therm. best 1/4 time 13.702 -- '95 Trans Am auto with flowmasters and a 160 therm. best 1/4 time 13.702 [ Edited on 01/29/2006 @ 03:18:23 ] Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 01-29-2006 @ 11:20:54 Reply | Top | Edit I definitally believe that there are some damn fast bolt-on Mach 1's. I want to find a Mach 1 around here with similar mods to me and race him. I raced a stock one from a roll and it was pretty bad, but then again I'd beat a stock LS1 pretty bad too. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: twofast95ta On: 01-29-2006 @ 15:21:39 Reply | Top | Edit An easy way to answer the question for you is to ask if yourself if you can out run a ls1. Stock for stock the mach will hang with the ls1 car, it comes down to the driver. Drivers being equal then it comes down the car. -- '95 Trans Am auto with flowmasters and a 160 therm. best 1/4 time 13.702 Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 01-29-2006 @ 16:30:53 Reply | Top | Edit They are very close stock for stock, but I'd say that on average a stock LS1 will win by about 2 tenths. I know for a fact that I'll smoke a stock LS1 and a stock Mach 1. I just wonder how I'd do against a Mach 1 with similar mods as me. The car that responds to the mods better will win baring driver error. I'd like to set it up and find out. The best races are the ones where the outcome is totally up in the air before hand. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: cypher_2001 On: 01-29-2006 @ 20:04:51 Reply | Top | Edit 25th, do the Mach 1's use the 3650 trannys? My buddies 01 Cobra just had 2nd gear dump on him. I did some research, and found out this is kinda a common problem with these trannys. Also, is it the same DOHC 4.6 as in the Cobras? -- Some stuff done to it  Posted By: twofast95ta On: 01-29-2006 @ 20:21:59 Reply | Top | Edit yes they have th 3650 tranny. As far as the motor it is basically the same except a few things, for example the cams, and a bit different head flow. The make more power than a 01 cobra which is the basically the same motor minus the things that i have mentioned. It also has a forged crank in the 5sp. It is nothing like the 03 04 cobra motor! Red if you are anywhere in my area i will run you, i am sure you will win as you have more power than i. But i am not sure by how much. If you are interisted i can let you know the power when i get the car back. -- '95 Trans Am auto with flowmasters and a 160 therm. best 1/4 time 13.702 Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 01-29-2006 @ 22:29:39 Reply | Top | Edit I'd definitally be up for it except that I live in CT. If there is a Thunder In The East this summer though, we could always do it there  -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: 25thmustang On: 01-29-2006 @ 22:53:10 Reply | Top | Edit That Orange one we had at the track has similar mods, but also I only saw him run on ET Streets. He pulled low 12s all day long, and I believe has been 11s at other events, but the mph is slightly lower than yours (111-112)! I would say both cars on the same tires, the Mach would have it down low, and you would come by up top. Probably very close track times, but you should have mph and steam at the far end! I actually havent heard anything about the trannies being weak, or any real other issues with them, but the cars are rare, and most are stock or mild and have low miles! Its refreshing to see them get punished down the track, but depressing to see some of them with autos! --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: twofast95ta On: 01-30-2006 @ 02:26:28 Reply | Top | Edit The trannys are ok but when you get above about 400hp you need to think about a better tranny. They do have a problem of not wanting to shift in 2nd when they are cold, mine has yet to do this to me. The one thing i can say is that top end my car is def. not a slouch, and i bet when i get it back it will be a lot better. I would love to race Red, I always like a good race, but i think he would win, not by much but a win none the less. -- '95 Trans Am auto with flowmasters and a 160 therm. best 1/4 time 13.702 Posted By: twofast95ta On: 02-01-2006 @ 02:51:10 Reply | Top | Edit Got the car back. It is just where i thought it would be, just to let you know the curve is great and the power is there. 316rwhp and 340rwtq with the mods in sig. But dont be fooled by the lower hp Red, it is still a beast. BTW I am in now way bashing the LS1 motor, car or any f-body for that matter. I love them! My good friends have them. One made 390 plus the juice in a 02 TA and the other has a vette that has the same H/C set up with the same power. Just to let you know the TA just put on turbo and is getting the motor built at the moment!!! It is going to be sick! -- '95 Trans Am auto with flowmasters and a 160 therm. best 1/4 time 13.702 Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 02-01-2006 @ 07:18:18 Reply | Top | Edit Sounds like a good combo you have there! Should run real strong. Now you just have to get some track numbers. Are there any tracks open around there? How long would it take you to get to Atco New Jersey from where you are? We could meet there sometime this year, that would awesome! Also, have you ever weighed your car? BTW, if I was ever going to get a mustang, it would definitally be a Mach 1. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' [ Edited on 02/01/2006 @ 07:19:08 ] Posted By: LT4CamZ On: 02-01-2006 @ 16:43:45 Reply | Top | Edit Theres a guy here with a 02 or 03 Mach1 looks good but I don't think they have the top end. I'm sure with an A4 it could get mid to high 13's easy. I assume with your mods you probably run in the mid 13's so I think it's be a damn good race. Could be anyone's race I would take my chances from the hole. -- True Pillar of Fbody.Com Green 96 Z28  Posted By: 25thmustang On: 02-01-2006 @ 21:52:37 Reply | Top | Edit Im not sure who you mean run mid 13s, but a Mach with 316 rwhp, a gear and some traction should be well into the 12s! --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: twofast95ta On: 02-02-2006 @ 02:00:09 Reply | Top | Edit It will be that was stock times. Have yet to take it to rockingham again. This time i am using some slicks, looking for 12.2-12.5. Not ging to launch hard, just trying to get a decent 60'. Stock a mach runs low to mids 13s. Oh yeah, and the new ones were made only in 03 and 04 -- '95 Trans Am auto with flowmasters and a 160 therm. best 1/4 time 13.702 Posted By: twofast95ta On: 02-02-2006 @ 02:02:33 Reply | Top | Edit It would take a while, i am in NC. But hopefully i will take the car to an 1/8 mile, only one here that is open, this weekend. If you guys are intrested i will let you know how i do. -- '95 Trans Am auto with flowmasters and a 160 therm. best 1/4 time 13.702 Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 02-02-2006 @ 07:52:04 Reply | Top | Edit Definitally let us know. My best 1/8 mile is 8.12 @ 88.3 mph with a 1.82 60' so that will give us a bottom of the track comparison -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: 25thmustang On: 02-02-2006 @ 16:18:44 Reply | Top | Edit Heheh 7.94 @ 85.8 here and 8.41 @ 85.x on radials!!! Hehehe
Definately post the times up. My guess is on slicks with some stout driving, 7.7-7.8 @ 88 or so. Should equate to a low 12 @ 110-112! Granted I dont know all of your mods, but my guess would be most if not all the bolt ons, and gears! --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 02-02-2006 @ 20:42:04 Reply | Top | Edit Damn, I'm gonna have to get back to the track early this year. I can't have you beating me by so much, lol. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: 25thmustang On: 02-03-2006 @ 23:15:00 Reply | Top | Edit If I only had $1600 Id be running some very impressive times. Found exactly what I have wanted for a long time. Then Id throw a set of heads on, and run the class I have been dying to run for years! --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 02-04-2006 @ 00:48:35 Reply | Top | Edit Oh sure, 12.5 with a bolt-on stang isn't good enough, lol. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: 25thmustang On: 02-04-2006 @ 18:14:15 Reply | Top | Edit Nope, my goal is some 12.4s or better this summer, and then people (with nitrous kits) have been begging me to throw a little 125-150 shot on it! --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 02-05-2006 @ 09:02:19 Reply | Top | Edit Well, I don't know if they allow it in the classes you race in (I doubt they do), but a decent shot of nitrous would definitally make that car a nasty little machine. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: OnefastIrocZ On: 02-05-2006 @ 17:07:03 Reply | Top | Edit 25thmustang,I have an IROC that matches your period correct 89' stang. I street race LS1's LT1's mustangs including the Mach 1. NO bottle,no blower,no bolt-on power adders at all. I street raced all the above with solid success. Closest competitor was a cammed up LS1 and came up 1 1/2 car lengths short on the street. Call it bad drivers, but I do this consistently. I think most people under estimate the t.p.i. induction set-up that it keeps everyone scratching their heads when they run me. Granted I do have bigger runners and injectors with base but come on,LS1's and LT1's breath much better than TPI's. Posted By: twofast95ta On: 02-05-2006 @ 18:28:51 Reply | Top | Edit your stock TPI with no power adders out runs all of them, right. Did i miss something? You should get demolished by all of them. -- '95 Trans Am auto with flowmasters and a 160 therm. best 1/4 time 13.702 Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 02-05-2006 @ 21:50:54 Reply | Top | Edit OnefastIrocZ, what are all of your mods? And do you have any track numbers? -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: 25thmustang On: 02-05-2006 @ 22:30:46 Reply | Top | Edit I agree without mod lists and track times, your just posting a bunch of whatever... Tell us what you REALLY HAVE, and if it demands respect it will get it. Remember I havent fool around with aftermarket heads, cams, or even suspension. YET! --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: OnefastIrocZ On: 02-06-2006 @ 02:24:03 Reply | Top | Edit Responding to twoslow95ta and respectively redscreaminmachine, these are my mods,plenum box fully ported (heavy)and messaged and port matched to slp ported and extrude honed runners to heavily ported edelbrock base w/58mm throttle body yet squirting 26lb accel injectors,msd ignition w/rev,module,msd coil,msd8.5 wires,crane 1.6 full roller rockers,Meziere water pump,no pollution equipment(air pump,egr...free hp)slp headers 2 1/2 dual into 3" duals with no converts dumping into 4" singe mufflex driver to slp loud mouth muffer for flow,modified air tract,built trans,vigilante convert,3:27gears,cust.chip&computer(jet)power tourdyno 337rearwhhp orlando speedway at 88(F) did 13.3@107.3 with 10.5 racemasters 15" destroyed my 2.1 60ft and pulled an 1.8 at 12.87 @106.2. Sorry I mislead you on no-bolt-ons,I meant power adders like turbos,blowers etc. custom compcam coming up,LS1 beehive springs. Forgot to mention frame tied w/comp.engineering subframe,edelbrock strut brace and 4 point comp. engineering frame cage modified for bolt-on application to stiffin up body and traction goodies like random tech.control arms,torque arm (adjustable),and panhard rod.Got her pretty tight. Best of all,Its completely stock looking from the outside right down to the mags. You'd never suspect me til its too late. Trick most just like I reeled in twofast95ta into thinking. Posted By: twofast95ta On: 02-06-2006 @ 03:02:43 Reply | Top | Edit I had nothing to go on, i have never seen your car, nor heard it. You said no bolt ons or power adders. Had i seen it or heard it i could tell it was not stock. Funny thing is that those times and speeds dont put you at killing a ls1 or a mach 1, esp. not a cammed ls1. Damn did the line on the reel just break! -- '95 Trans Am auto with flowmasters and a 160 therm. best 1/4 time 13.702 Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 02-06-2006 @ 07:09:53 Reply | Top | Edit I have seen bolt-on TPI's go 12's on very rare occasions so I'm definitally not gonna call BS, but 337 rwhp does seem quite high for a stock heads and cam L98. Did I miss it or are you running stock heads and cam? Also, do you have any weight reduction? The races don't bother me because driver error and launch can account for alot, but the dyno numbers seem high, although they do go together with the mph. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: OnefastIrocZ On: 02-06-2006 @ 10:44:24 Reply | Top | Edit In the Orlando area,as well as we are speaking on-line,I do hang out with a club (not a menber)called the FUELSLUTS. I do invite anyone to come visit us cause we have many venues to play at. Look them up at www.feulsluts.net for directions when ever you guys get a chance. I'd love to show you what I have and that If there is any one who can atest my IROC reading this now please input. My vehicle is an 1990 IROC-Z w/5.7 rated factory at 245 hp w/ 355 ft. trq. It is white in color with polished mags with license plates that read "1 FAST Z". It is the cleanest Camaro you'll ever see. Looking to learn how to print up pictures on this damn machine so you all can peek at it. Hey twofast95ta, seems like Im way faster than you, unless your machine broke (pun intended)and could't keep up with your wreel. Posted By: OnefastIrocZ On: 02-06-2006 @ 11:01:12 Reply | Top | Edit Im up front after any race. You all have to under stand, all of us never reveal ALL mods just to keep an edge on the track or street. I know tough to believe a 3 Gen. quicker than 4 Gen powerhouses does seem ridiculous, but this 3gen delivers and is willing to prove how quick is really is. Where and when? Posted By: 25thmustang On: 02-06-2006 @ 14:20:30 Reply | Top | Edit Your still slower than me, and I have a ways to go before my combo is maxed out. Im looking for some 12.4s or better this summer...
Also is it stock heads and cam? Its not that your quicker, its what yuo said before anyone knew any info about your car! And your times are good, but hard to believe you beat every LS1 and LT1 you race without much worry. In my area, I can only name a handful of LS1s and LT1s I would beat... --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: OnefastIrocZ On: 02-06-2006 @ 14:42:08 Reply | Top | Edit Cant always believe what you read?! 25thmustang,my stock heads are stock so is the cam!! Kind of hard that your able to do 12.5 w/slicks with maxed out. Ive raced only what was presented to me. I did not race ALL of the LS1's and LT1's here, just the ones worth up a good drag. We have plenty of very quick 4gen.Camaros that I wont mess with. I know better. They range anywhere from 9's to 13's seconds. Just a good kick to see an IROC run with the best 4th gens out there and win. I get the respect from them all after any run. Think you messed with the wrong LS1 and LT1's out there. With your times on the street,you should beat any Camaro even with some small mods. Any chance of location so we can meet someway? Im up for a small vacation somewhere. Id love to run you. Even though according to your times you should beat me!!! I think I have enough to take you! ALL the readers would love that Im sure! Its bragging rights lets call it if you are calling me out. What do you think? Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 02-06-2006 @ 18:05:30 Reply | Top | Edit It's not hard at all to believe that a 3rd gen beat a 4th gen. It all comes down to mods and driving. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: OnefastIrocZ On: 02-06-2006 @ 18:24:58 Reply | Top | Edit Got that right! Im waiting for a response from 25thmustang. It is what it is. Believe it or not,its quicker than you may think it is. Ill keep you guessing??!!Until the time is right! Posted By: 25thmustang On: 02-06-2006 @ 20:39:02 Reply | Top | Edit Sure in the summer time head up to CT (or NJ where the track is) and Id be more than happy to race. I personally dont street race (unless I am friends with the other guy and I wont go from a dig to a full track pass) but the track is where its at! The combo I have now isnt bad, but this summer I have a few more small things that might work wonders. My goals are 12.4s on slicks, 12.8s on radials, and I like to be conservative! Ill gladly have a fun race, but can say there are a few guys on the site here that can back me and my car up as far as what it runs, and how stock it really is! --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: OnefastIrocZ On: 02-06-2006 @ 22:07:49 Reply | Top | Edit Looking to pop custom grind cam from comp with LS1 springs in about a month from now. Dont really want to wait. Have friend who is planning on leaving to n.y. Never been there,or jersey. Isnt that where SLP is? Dont they have dynoes they could rent to public? Dont mind trailering Camaro up there and back! Whats the weather up there and is the track opened yet? Can you hold off on your mods till several weeks? We could meet and have a good friendly run and maybe out for some drinks or whatever. You wont be disappointed on our run. Ill guarantee you itll be a good drag. Still think Ill win though!! sorry!! IROCs rule!!! Posted By: 25thmustang On: 02-06-2006 @ 22:30:14 Reply | Top | Edit I wouldnt mind, but my cars going under the knife soon for new paint, and probably take care of those mods at that time. In NJ I run at Etown which is a good track, and usually has decent prep! Right now we arent lucky enough to have tracks open, but they will come spring time! Catch me in the summer time, and it might still be a good race, and if not, I can get a Mustang that will be a good race ! I am always up for some fun at the track, and some heads up races!--
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: twofast95ta On: 02-06-2006 @ 22:58:20 Reply | Top | Edit Hell, i am in NC and i do street race, come see me. Then you will see my tail lights. Those times were when i was stock. And if you dont have any spray then you WILL lose. Your mph is not much higher than mine when i was stock. I could not keep the tires planted, hence the 2.2 60'. I would love a good race, you may have more hp, but peak numbers are not the only thing. It is all about the area under the curve -- '04 Mach 1 with Hooker Super Comp Headers, Hooker Offroad X pipe, Single Chamber Flow Masters, Steeda Underdrive Pullies, C&L CAI, Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter, Custom SCT Tune 316 RWHP 340 RWTQ Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 02-07-2006 @ 00:11:56 Reply | Top | Edit Hells Yeah! Heads up racing rules! If you came up to NJ this summer then I'd also be sure to head down and meet up with you. Sounds like alot of fun! -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: OnefastIrocZ On: 02-07-2006 @ 14:09:10 Reply | Top | Edit I'll keep you all posted when I come up there. I mentioned this to some of my friends here and mentioned that the Power Tour is up towards you guys. We were already planning on doing that this summer. Hopefully, it will be about 5 of us with mostly 3thrd and 4th Gen.vehicles heading up there; 2002 Camaro SS with bolt-on (quick), 1997 Z28 w/built LT1 (His car is almost done),1987 Black IROC with Holley TunnelRam (also built and quick) and lastly an 1974 Olds Cutlass (also built and pretty quick) and lastly,my IROC. But for now, my concern is this weekend with this old dude and his ZR1. IROC sitting in garage ready. Remove mags, disconnected sway bar and installed my skinnies(15 x 3 1/2) Weld drag lights (15 x 8)rear. Re-adjusted torque arm for more downward pressure for better pinion angle and re-installed(only for important races)my Random tech. anti squat relocator bracket. (HINT.. traction problems are no mre when you run my set-up cause business is BUSINESS!!!)I think I'll pull at least 1 1/2 from the start, so long as he is only running street drag radials. Its belly 1/4 tank full with race gas (swear this stuff goes up when I pull in at American Motorsports) and yes,another trick up my sleeve,re-adjust closed loop parameters to enrich (fatter)fuel curve to increase trap on my Accel Management system. (cool to look at especially in drive mode on an IBM PC).Maybe I make make small small lie lie,Compucam is still considered a stock cam? Aint nothing but .452 /.465 lift any ways!! or is it .509/.522 lift-Hell I can remember anyways. Works awesome with the ported and polished Vortec heads. Has anybody ever heard of a 6 angle valve job before? (My neighbor is a machinist,and a damn good one to) Well,if you didnt,now you have. Besides,the time I posted is about 2YEARS OLD!! Yes,I do make more power than 337 rwhp. That number is looooong gone! And yes, T.P.I.s do suffer big time top end, but hogged out completely and you can hide awholalotta power without anybody suspecting nuttin! www.Arizona Speed and Marine and T.P.I.S. Think I push around 425rwhp. Dont push it twofast95trash.(Even with spray) Posted By: 25thmustang On: 02-07-2006 @ 15:19:07 Reply | Top | Edit SO you have heads and a cam??? I really didnt understand much of what was posted there and my brians too fried from school to try and read it. Either way I dont street race but will race at the track for fun! --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 02-07-2006 @ 18:17:47 Reply | Top | Edit Unless I read that totally wrong, you have a totally built motor that just looks totally stock. I'm guessing your 12.8 @ 106 is with an older setup. I thought that 337rwhp from a bolt-on TPI sounded WAY too high. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: twofast95ta On: 02-08-2006 @ 02:01:59 Reply | Top | Edit Dude you are full of crap. First the car was stock, the it had a few things, and now it it is fully built. If that was the case then why would you not say to start with. Watch-out guys next it will be a jet car! -- '95 Trans Am auto with flowmasters and a 160 therm. best 1/4 time 13.702 -- '04 Mach 1 with Hooker Super Comp Headers, Hooker Offroad X pipe, Single Chamber Flow Masters, Steeda Underdrive Pullies, C&L CAI, Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter, Custom SCT Tune 316 RWHP 340 RWTQ [ Edited on 02/08/2006 @ 02:11:48 ] Posted By: OnefastIrocZ On: 02-08-2006 @ 11:03:14 Reply | Top | Edit Sorry guys, I guess it is what it is. FAST!! Beside,I need not run from nobody! Im here and can prove, your there who CANT. Posted By: 25thmustang On: 02-08-2006 @ 11:14:48 Reply | Top | Edit If you mean that I cant prove what my car runs, your sadly mistaken. RSM and BSM both live right near me, have met me, and my father (who also has a quick 5.0) and can attest to what my car has done at the track. In return I can attest to what both of them have gone (both of them have faster cars than your 12.8, and RSM hs two cars faster than that). I would be happy to still race you, if you are going to be up this way! As far as how fast it is, you told us 12.8 @ 106. Thats quick definately, but not blistering fast by anyones means, I mean I know a few guys with stock motored 5.0s who have been 12.5 - 12.7! --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: OnefastIrocZ On: 02-08-2006 @ 13:13:30 Reply | Top | Edit She's pretty quick and fast but NOT as fast as I'm overboasting. Again,I dont claim as being the fastest but am running a ZR-1 this weekend at Orlando speedway. That should tell you roughly how quick I am. My time is two years old roughly and Ive been working on it to make it faster. Now that aint no BULL,neither is the power and speed of the ZR-1!! 25thmustang,guess we'll talk details on travel and date times later when things thaw out. I know you can prove your times but I'm in rebuttal with twofast95ta. Hey twofast95ta, I never knew you we so brutally HONEST! You sure your ride isnt just a little quicker than your time slips shows? Cheating aint cheating unless you get caught. Nobody wants to lose. You never know who's calling you out next! Posted By: twofast95ta On: 02-08-2006 @ 13:15:49 Reply | Top | Edit Ok OnefastirocZ. Way to be an internet tough guy. I will never meet one or anyone one else on this meggage fourm (nothing aginst you guys) so i have nothing to hide from any of them. And why in the hell would you say that i cant prove it? Prove what that your a troll. Please! -- '95 Trans Am auto with flowmasters and a 160 therm. best 1/4 time 13.702 Posted By: twofast95ta On: 02-08-2006 @ 13:18:41 Reply | Top | Edit Oh 25th I noticed something in your sig about a 2006 gt. It is a beautiful car a good buddy of mine has one. Iroc if you look at my earlier post i said those times were when i was stock. Not recent. -- '95 Trans Am auto with flowmasters and a 160 therm. best 1/4 time 13.702 Posted By: OnefastIrocZ On: 02-08-2006 @ 13:27:05 Reply | Top | Edit Hey dude ,you said that im full of crap and that next ill pass off my car as a jet car. My Camaro is what it is! Hey did I tell you that I also have a jet car? Posted By: OnefastIrocZ On: 02-08-2006 @ 13:36:15 Reply | Top | Edit Heresay is Heresay! Thats all anyone can type here. We all have to respect it otherwise. I guess what really matters in on the track or street, whichever really matters to you or anyone else. Posted By: 25thmustang On: 02-08-2006 @ 13:41:18 Reply | Top | Edit Hey twofast95ta, thanks about the 06. Its my brothers car. Has been ordered but wont be in till mid March or so. We will definately be having fun with that car (bastard brothers making bank right out of college so we got money to spend on it). Also I might be going to Mustang Week in Myrtle Beach this June, and if so you should try and head down there. We might have a bunch of CT Mustangs going down for the week, and will be a badass time! Onefastiroc, I thought you meant my times, but now that you said you didnt, thats cool. My times are old, but I havent done anything to improve them much so I dont think the cars any faster now. I have plans and parts to make it faster, but priorities are elsewhere with the car and life! Cheating in racing is how most people win. Im very close to heads up Mustang and how the top guys run, and can say most if not all of the top runners are doing something that if found out, would cause them to be disqualified. This is one reason I dont plan to be serious into heads up racing, as I wouldnt want to cheat, and would rather have fun then spend my life at it! --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: OnefastIrocZ On: 02-08-2006 @ 13:59:06 Reply | Top | Edit Got that right!!!Thats how "Pinks" got started. Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 02-08-2006 @ 17:58:46 Reply | Top | Edit So, if you did a few things to improve upon the 12.87 then how fast are you looking to go now? Or will we find out on Friday after you race the ZR1? -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: OnefastIrocZ On: 02-08-2006 @ 19:02:34 Reply | Top | Edit Tough to say. Never really went back because of track rules and equipment infractions that they could hit me with. You know the standards, cage, helmet, shut-offs,d-loops etc...all that safety jargon. I know Im much faster, but dont want to mention it at this time. Hope you catch my drift! Posted By: OnefastIrocZ On: 02-08-2006 @ 19:04:59 Reply | Top | Edit Sorry ZR-1 man! Posted By: 25thmustang On: 02-08-2006 @ 22:25:55 Reply | Top | Edit I have been going to the track with a basically illegal car for a long time now. I have a DS loop, a legal helmut, and actually have a cage going in (if that goes in, all bets are off under the hood), but dont have the extended studs yet! --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: twofast95ta On: 02-09-2006 @ 00:08:26 Reply | Top | Edit My friend has an 06 gt. He bought it from Dale Jarrett ford. They financed a cat back, lowering springs, ground effects kit, wheels and tires, a chip, and the shaker hood set up. His car is bad***. It is silver, beautiful car. -- '95 Trans Am auto with flowmasters and a 160 therm. best 1/4 time 13.702 Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 02-09-2006 @ 07:29:00 Reply | Top | Edit So basically he was ablt to buy the car with mods from a dealer? That's awesome! -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: 25thmustang On: 02-09-2006 @ 09:08:42 Reply | Top | Edit I think a lot of dealers are doing that with 05 and 06 Mustangs. And in my eyes thats an awesome thing, because a lot of the the owners want these simple mods done right when they get the car, so why not give it to them! --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: OnefastIrocZ On: 02-09-2006 @ 11:18:16 Reply | Top | Edit One day left!! Posted By: trans95am On: 02-09-2006 @ 16:38:17 Reply | Top | Edit just to let you guys know that the race should be taking place this weekend so i will keep you guys posted! anything i can do real quick to squeeze some extra horses out of it --
1995 Trans AM A4: SLP Loudmouth II,Pacesetter Coated Long Tubes, Pacesetter Offroad Y Pipe, NGK TR55 Plugs, Taylor Spiro Pro Wires, SLP CAI, Vortech Elbow, Airfoil, 160 thermo, 17X9.5 Chrome Z06's wrapped in Nitto Street Tires Best ET 13.820 at 99 mph Best 60' ft 2.036 before the Headers/y pipe and plugs/wires Posted By: OnefastIrocZ On: 02-09-2006 @ 23:39:03 Reply | Top | Edit If you have a Ram-Air system,remove your K&N filters, you should pick-up 2-4 MPH. Replace them shortly afterward race. Best and quickest way to make more power!!! Posted By: twofast95ta On: 02-10-2006 @ 03:58:26 Reply | Top | Edit spray it! -- '04 Mach 1 with Hooker Super Comp Headers, Hooker Offroad X pipe, Single Chamber Flow Masters, Steeda Underdrive Pullies, C&L CAI, Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter, Custom SCT Tune 316 RWHP 340 RWTQ Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 02-10-2006 @ 07:07:05 Reply | Top | Edit Pull out some weight. All the seats except the driver's seat, plus the front swaybar would take a nice chunk off the car. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: trans95am On: 02-10-2006 @ 20:19:32 Reply | Top | Edit well it looks like we are going to get a big snow storm in nj on saturday....so if he calls me tonight its on if not we are going to have to wait until next weekend...sorry guys! --
1995 Trans AM A4: SLP Loudmouth II,Pacesetter Coated Long Tubes, Pacesetter Offroad Y Pipe, NGK TR55 Plugs, Taylor Spiro Pro Wires, SLP CAI, Vortech Elbow, Airfoil, 160 thermo, 17X9.5 Chrome Z06's wrapped in Nitto Street Tires Best ET 13.820 at 99 mph Best 60' ft 2.036 before the Headers/y pipe and plugs/wires Posted By: 25thmustang On: 02-10-2006 @ 23:51:56 Reply | Top | Edit Same deal here in CT, and of course I just started to get working on the car again! Cant even move it around in the snow (we have a bad driveway), let alone actually get work done on it! --
1989 Mustang LX: Bolt-Ons! 12.5 @ 106 (slicks), 12.9 @ 108 (radials) 1993 LX, 1991 LX: NMRA car, 1986 vert, 1986 Hatch: race project, 1964 Galaxie, 2006 GT: Brothers soon to be! Posted By: twofast95ta On: 02-11-2006 @ 04:24:35 Reply | Top | Edit Hopefully you will go from a dig. A top end race will result in you losing. Kill him out of the hole and shut it down about 100 mph, if you can keep him off that long. That is assuming he is an average driver and you being good. -- '95 Trans Am auto with flowmasters and a 160 therm. best 1/4 time 13.702 Posted By: trans95am On: 02-11-2006 @ 17:49:22 Reply | Top | Edit you dont think i can hang up top with him with my mods? --
1995 Trans AM A4: SLP Loudmouth II,Pacesetter Coated Long Tubes, Pacesetter Offroad Y Pipe, NGK TR55 Plugs, Taylor Spiro Pro Wires, SLP CAI, Vortech Elbow, Airfoil, 160 thermo, 17X9.5 Chrome Z06's wrapped in Nitto Street Tires Best ET 13.820 at 99 mph Best 60' ft 2.036 before the Headers/y pipe and plugs/wires Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 02-11-2006 @ 18:11:52 Reply | Top | Edit It's doubtful, but anything's possible. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: twofast95ta On: 02-11-2006 @ 21:47:03 Reply | Top | Edit I highly doubt it to. The mach stock traps 105-107 in the 1/4. The headers didnt add that much. I say race him for shits and giggles and let us know! -- '95 Trans Am auto with flowmasters and a 160 therm. best 1/4 time 13.702 Posted By: trans95am On: 02-11-2006 @ 22:44:09 Reply | Top | Edit what other mods would help me out against him...i was thinkin some 3.73's and maybe a stall? --
1995 Trans AM A4: SLP Loudmouth II,Pacesetter Coated Long Tubes, Pacesetter Offroad Y Pipe, NGK TR55 Plugs, Taylor Spiro Pro Wires, SLP CAI, Vortech Elbow, Airfoil, 160 thermo, 17X9.5 Chrome Z06's wrapped in Nitto Street Tires Best ET 13.820 at 99 mph Best 60' ft 2.036 before the Headers/y pipe and plugs/wires Posted By: OnefastIrocZ On: 02-12-2006 @ 00:02:14 Reply | Top | Edit Barely beat ZR-1! He was quick. I could have done better though, beat him by only 3/4's of a car! Damn, I heard that 5.7 litre from in my car, he did better than I thought! But I guess, winning is winning! 76bird, was that your T/A in black that just totally destroyed that Grand National? Posted By: OnefastIrocZ On: 02-12-2006 @ 00:07:40 Reply | Top | Edit Track sucked!! It drizzled alittle bit here and there,but just seemed different! Couldnt hook for crap! Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 02-12-2006 @ 08:55:05 Reply | Top | Edit The gears will help some and the stall will definitally help quite a bit. The best thing you could do is get some drag radials, really heat them up good and run from a dig. A bolt-on LT1 can trap 105-106 mph in the 1/4 (I know because mine did) but being an auto you're at a disadvantage from a roll. If both cars were able to trap the same in the 1/4 then I'd put my money on the stick car from a higher roll. However, with good tires you'll have the definite advantage from a stop. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, High-Flow Cats, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: twofast95ta On: 02-12-2006 @ 14:38:15 Reply | Top | Edit I know a bolt on LT1 can run 105-107 in the 1/4. All i was saying was that with the headers and y pipe he would not pick up 8 mph in tyhe 1/4. -- '95 Trans Am auto with flowmasters and a 160 therm. best 1/4 time 13.702 Posted By: trans95am On: 02-17-2006 @ 20:44:18 Reply | Top | Edit alright fellas the time has come...the race is going to take place in about 45 min...i will post the results asap! --
1995 Trans AM A4: SLP Loudmouth II,Pacesetter Coated Long Tubes, Pacesetter Offroad Y Pipe, NGK TR55 Plugs, Taylor Spiro Pro Wires, SLP CAI, Vortech Elbow, Airfoil, 160 thermo, 17X9.5 Chrome Z06's wrapped in Nitto Street Tires Best ET 13.820 at 99 mph Best 60' ft 2.036 before the Headers/y pipe and plugs/wires Posted By: twofast95ta On: 02-21-2006 @ 01:19:11 Reply | Top | Edit sooooooo how did it go? -- '95 Trans Am auto with flowmasters and a 160 therm. best 1/4 time 13.702 Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 02-21-2006 @ 07:28:57 Reply | Top | Edit Yeah, why does it always take people so long to tell the results? -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, Off Road Pipes, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 02-27-2006 @ 07:26:37 Reply | Top | Edit I'm going to say that he didn't race based on the fact that there don't seem to be any results... -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, Off Road Pipes, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials; 344 RWHP @ 5350 RPM, and 356 RWTQ @ 4650 RPM; new mods: 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60' Posted By: twofast95ta On: 02-27-2006 @ 12:16:33 Reply | Top | Edit I agree! -- '95 Trans Am auto with flowmasters and a 160 therm. best 1/4 time 13.702 Posted By: trans95am On: 03-03-2006 @ 11:31:23 Reply | Top | Edit sorry guys! just raced him last weekend and i havent gotten a chance to get on here...so the results The first time we went from a 20 mph roll because i didnt have time to throw my drags on that night...i was comin from work...He didnt spin at all but my car was spinning till about 40...he pulled about half a car while i was spinning and then when i finally caught there was too much ground to make up... Then we went from a 60 roll where i knew i was going to get murdered...Seeing as his car is a stick he didnt have that delay where mine had to downshift so at about 100 he was 2 and a 1/2 cars I asked the kid to come to the track and race me there but he seems very hesistant about it..Down low i know i would pull on him but up top his car deff has balls...on a side note... There was a 350z there with a $1500 exhaust, short shifter and an intake...damnn these things got balls from a roll... I think he left it in 3rd and we went from about 65...he pulled about half a car and then i started reeling him back in and passed him at about 110...Had about 1 car length on him till 145...but these cars are deff impressive It is time for more mods...My first question being....gears or stall 1st?...im kinda leaning towards a stall....opinions please?? --
1995 Trans AM A4: SLP Loudmouth II,Pacesetter Coated Long Tubes, Pacesetter Offroad Y Pipe, NGK TR55 Plugs, Taylor Spiro Pro Wires, SLP CAI, Vortech Elbow, Airfoil, 160 thermo, 17X9.5 Chrome Z06's wrapped in Nitto Street Tires Best ET 13.820 at 99 mph Best 60' ft 2.036 before the Headers/y pipe and plugs/wires Posted By: twofast95ta On: 03-04-2006 @ 01:44:09 Reply | Top | Edit a mach has plenty of bottom end. with 320 ft/lbs of tq it will get up and go. good race though. -- '95 Trans Am auto with flowmasters and a 160 therm. best 1/4 time 13.702 Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 03-04-2006 @ 03:39:06 Reply | Top | Edit Sounds like a good race. Pretty much the results I expected. Thanks for posting the results! Also, it's good to see that someone agrees with me about the 350Z's. My friend had one with full exhaust and a cold air and with my auto LT1 TA it was always alot closer from a roll then I thought it should be. I had a few bolt-ons and a cam and if we started low then I beat him pretty good, but a highway roll was way too close for comfort (considering my mods at the time). I did recently learn that a 350Z has a 5th gear ratio of 1:1, so the closer ratios is the reason they are fast from a roll, I think. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, Off Road Pipes, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials, 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60'; new mods: ESP1 cam, Comp springs, TR Pushrods; Dyno: 420 RWHP, 374 RWTQ
Posted By: trans95am On: 03-04-2006 @ 21:13:40 Reply | Top | Edit yeah down low he had nothing on me but from a roll we were neck and neck they can hang with a bolt on LT1 up top all day long --
1995 Trans AM A4: SLP Loudmouth II,Pacesetter Coated Long Tubes, Pacesetter Offroad Y Pipe, NGK TR55 Plugs, Taylor Spiro Pro Wires, SLP CAI, Vortech Elbow, Airfoil, 160 thermo, 17X9.5 Chrome Z06's wrapped in Nitto Street Tires Best ET 13.820 at 99 mph Best 60' ft 2.036 before the Headers/y pipe and plugs/wires Posted By: twofast95ta On: 03-06-2006 @ 01:05:28 Reply | Top | Edit good job, how does your car stand up to a ls1 car? -- '95 Trans Am auto with flowmasters and a 160 therm. best 1/4 time 13.702 Posted By: trans95am On: 03-06-2006 @ 11:52:21 Reply | Top | Edit i havent raced a stock LS1 yet...i ran 13.6@102 at the track friday night but i was spinning alot even with nitto drags so i think it may be time for ET Streets..Im gonna give the nittos one more chance since the weather was really cold --
1995 Trans AM A4: SLP Loudmouth II,Pacesetter Coated Long Tubes, Pacesetter Offroad Y Pipe, NGK TR55 Plugs, Taylor Spiro Pro Wires, SLP CAI, Vortech Elbow, Airfoil, 160 thermo, 17X9.5 Chrome Z06's wrapped in Nitto Street Tires Best ET 13.820 at 99 mph Best 60' ft 2.036 before the Headers/y pipe and plugs/wires Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 03-06-2006 @ 18:59:23 Reply | Top | Edit The Nittos should hook up fine with your setup as long as you really get them hot. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, Off Road Pipes, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials, 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60'; new mods: ESP1 cam, Comp springs, TR Pushrods; Dyno: 420 RWHP, 374 RWTQ
Posted By: trans95am On: 03-06-2006 @ 22:03:57 Reply | Top | Edit i thought i was heating them up long enoughh i guess not...what psi should i set them at? i had them at 16 that nightt...is that too low? too high? --
1995 Trans AM A4: SLP Loudmouth II,Pacesetter Coated Long Tubes, Pacesetter Offroad Y Pipe, NGK TR55 Plugs, Taylor Spiro Pro Wires, SLP CAI, Vortech Elbow, Airfoil, 160 thermo, 17X9.5 Chrome Z06's wrapped in Nitto Street Tires Best ET 13.820 at 99 mph Best 60' ft 2.036 before the Headers/y pipe and plugs/wires Posted By: RedScreaminMachine On: 03-07-2006 @ 07:47:02 Reply | Top | Edit Too low. Try leaving them around 26 psi. -- Red 2002 Camaro Z28 M6 with Hurst shifter, T-tops, Leather, 12 CD Changer; Ram Air Scoop, SLP Lid, K&N Filter, Smooth Bellow, Borla Exhaust, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, Off Road Pipes, BMR Adjustable Torque Arm, BMR Rear Lower Control Arms, Nitto Drag Radials, 3.73 gears, FAST 78mm TB, SPEC 3 Clutch, Pro 5.0 Shifter; new time: 12.51 @ 114.2 mph, 1.82 60'; new mods: ESP1 cam, Comp springs, TR Pushrods; Dyno: 420 RWHP, 374 RWTQ
Posted By: trans95am On: 03-07-2006 @ 11:15:41 Reply | Top | Edit alright next time i go to etown i will deff do that...thanks RSM --
1995 Trans AM A4: SLP Loudmouth II,Pacesetter Coated Long Tubes, Pacesetter Offroad Y Pipe, NGK TR55 Plugs, Taylor Spiro Pro Wires, SLP CAI, Vortech Elbow, Airfoil, 160 thermo, 17X9.5 Chrome Z06's wrapped in Nitto Street Tires Best ET 13.820 at 99 mph Best 60' ft 2.036 before the Headers/y pipe and plugs/wires
|
||||
| If it looks (c) it probably is - All work done by James Hogan | ||||
