|
[ Post New Message | Reply | Edit
Profile | Register | Search | Current Connections | Message Board FAQ | Lost Password? ]
Fuel cells and alluminum drive-shafts
Posted By:
MIAMIVortec
On:
01-04-2008 @ 12:15:20 Reply | Edit
I was considering buying the 2parts for the obvious reasons lighter and for race......Does anyone know the weight difference between the stock gas tank vs. fuel cell & the stock drive-shaft vs. Alluminum drive-shaft.
All feedback appreciated
-- If anyone in Miami or close, I have a shit-load of Camaro parts I'm desperately selling for "PENNIES". If you want any parts shipped just let me know what you need. PARTS MUST GO
Parts needed, will buy or trade for:
Fuel cell, alluminum drive-shaft, Flowmaster 50series(new), headers, fiberglass fenders.
Posted By:
BADBOTY
On:
10-01-2005 @ 21:34:39 Reply | Top | Edit
On the drive shaft stock weight is about 15 to 20 lbs and the aluminum is about 8 to 10 lbs. Im not sure about the fuel cell.
Posted By:
MIAMIVortec350
On:
10-01-2005 @ 21:38:25 Reply | Top | Edit
Thanks man. Only a 7-8Lb difference isn't worth $200+ dollars, if your numbers are right.... I guess ill see about the fuel cell weight difference now.
Posted By:
Brad89IROCZ
On:
10-02-2005 @ 00:50:21 Reply | Top | Edit
The driveshaft is rotational mass though. An almost 10 pound decrease in rotational mass is a lot more significant than just stationary weight. It's not just weight reduction, it allows the engine to rev faster as well. I would do that and f*ck the fuel cell. You won't see any performance gains from a fuel cell. --

Posted By:
MIAMIVortec350
On:
10-02-2005 @ 03:14:23 Reply | Top | Edit
So you telling I should forget about the fuel cell and switch the drive-shaft??
Note that the weight-loss is only 8-10lbs according to Badboty.
Posted By:
bigtallcampbell
On:
10-02-2005 @ 09:27:06 Reply | Top | Edit
Brad89IROCz is right...rotational mass is always a better way to go than stationary weight. There is a coefficient of power loss per pound of rotating mass that is greater than the power gained per pound of stationary weight shed.
As far as the cell, the rule of thumb is loss 100 lbs, get a tenth (on the quarter). So I'd say screw the fuel cell and go with the driveshaft.
What other performanc eparts have you put on your car? You wouldn't notice the difference on a stock car. -- --BigTallCampbell
87 Black Trans AM GTA, T-Tops, 350 Carb. Forged Crank, Rods, Pistons, 10:1 Compression, Hedman Shorty Headers, Edelbrock Torker2 Intake, Edelbrock 750 Carb.
Posted By:
MIAMIVortec350
On:
10-02-2005 @ 15:14:01 Reply | Top | Edit
This is a new-project. I had originally bought a few parts for a plain 350 motor, but I stumbled across 350Vortec which is rolling motor, so know I must start from scratch........But i was plaining on trying to lose some weight by buying some light-weight parts such as, fuel cell and a alluminum drive-shaft, which don't seem to be worth the buy.
Posted By:
95ttoplt1
On:
01-03-2008 @ 01:07:15 Reply | Top | Edit
h'mm --

Posted By:
91gtaws6
On:
01-04-2008 @ 11:46:35 Reply | Top | Edit
I think that the drive shaft would be a good buy. The aluminum is stronger and lighter so you will have less of a chance of anything happeneing and you can increase your rwhp a couple points probably. I think that it was Chevy High Performance magazine that put on on and gained 2 rwhp off stock motor so if you start putting more to the ground it would be a good idea.
Posted By:
coolram62
On:
01-14-2008 @ 11:51:10 Reply | Top | Edit
You can go with either a JG1 aluminum driveshaft from a 3rd Gen or an aluminum shaft from a 4th Gen LS1 car.The earlier 4th Gen LT1 aluminum shafts had quality problems from what I've read.They interchange between 3rd and 4th and between automatic and manual.And you can usually find one for $100 shipped(or less).You would only need a custom shaft for high HP applications. [ Edited on 01/14/2008 @ 11:52:15 ]
Back To Topic List
|